Parliamentary Government, Unasked For Advice
The Czech Republic won't have a government till sometime this Summer, the Likud Party in Israel joined in a coalition with Labor (traditional rivals) in order to form a government, and Belgium lacked a government for more than three months just last year. What's going on?
In modern Parliamentary democracies, the majority party doesn't get to become Prime Minister automatically, instead they need to form a coalition of parties that forms at least half the Parliament. This is daft, and "not having a government for months on end" is just one of the problems.
The vote of "no confidence" is how these types of governments usually end. It is a way of saying "No" to the current leadership without saying "yes" to any new leadership. A better way exists. Instead of "no confidence" votes, the Parliament should hold a new election for the PM job. Now, of course, you might ask "But if every party votes for their own leader, and no party has more than half the seats, don't you have the same problem?" Not if you use NOT BRAINDEAD STUPID voting systems like we have here in the "Greatest Country On Earth".
Real voting is Cloneproof, Monotonic, and Condorcet, although the absolutely best voting system I haven't had time to prove, I have presented other people's work which shows that Schulze and Tideman are really good.
Come to think of it, in a body as small as the Israeli Parliament (in any body small enough that the members know each other and will have to continue to work together) the Borda system can be even better, and maybe even the Borda-variant known as "Range Voting."
Either way you get continuity of operations in the Parliament.